Judge dismisses David Perdue lawsuit alleging election fraud
The Road to November: Georgia gubernatorial candidate David Perdue full interview
Russ Spencer sits down with Georgia Republican gubernatorial candidate David Perdue in this week's episode of The Road to November. Perdue discusses what he considers failures of the Biden administration as well as his path for Georgia.
ATLANTA - A Georgia judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by former U.S. Sen. David Perdue that alleged fraudulent or counterfeit ballots were counted in the state’s most populous county during the 2020 general election.
Perdue filed the lawsuit, along with an individual voter, in December a few days after he announced that he would be challenging Gov. Brian Kemp in the Republican primary. Among other things, the suit sought access to examine absentee ballots, saying that would allow the petitioners to prove that there had been fraud in Fulton County.
Investigators with the secretary of state’s office found no evidence to support the fraud claims, but that hasn’t stopped former President Donald Trump, Perdue and others from continuing to spread them.
The suit was similar to another filed by a group of voters that was dismissed in October because a judge found the group hadn’t alleged a "particularized injury" and therefore didn’t have standing to sue. That ruling has been appealed.
Perdue and voter Elizabeth Grace Lennon argued that their state constitutional rights to equal protection and due process have been violated. Perdue claims his particularized injury was that he was a candidate for reelection in November but failed to achieve a majority, forcing him into a runoff with Democrat Jon Ossoff that Perdue lost. Lennon says she sought to cast an in-person early vote in October 2020 but was told someone had already submitted a mail ballot in her name.
Republican Gubernatorial candidate David Perdue speaks at a campaign event on March 29, 2022 in Duluth, Georgia. (Photo by Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images)
In an order dated Wednesday dismissing the lawsuit, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney wrote that it "is not really about Perdue’s loss or Lennon’s personal voting experience." Its core claims, he notes, are that several batches of absentee ballots were scanned multiple times and thousands of unlawful counterfeit absentee ballots were counted and certified in Fulton County.
Those are claims that were repeatedly pushed in the aftermath of the 2020 election by people who allege that widespread fraud caused the presidential election to be stolen from Trump. Perdue, who is trailing Kemp in polls as the May 24 Republican primary grows near, has made claims of a "stolen and rigged" election a central pillar of his campaign and frequently talks about the lawsuit while campaigning.
The lawsuit asks the judge to declare that county officials violated the petitioners’ equal protection and due process rights, but such a declaration requires that they demonstrate that if the court doesn’t act, their interests will be harmed in the future, McBurney wrote. Instead, they asked him to make a declaration about something that had already happened in the past, and the court can’t do that, he wrote.
The lawsuit also asks the judge to issue a series of orders that would empower the petitioners’ experts to "intrude upon the sealed ballot materials of tens of thousands of Fulton County voters, hunt for speculative voter fraud or error, and then determine for themselves what the ‘actual’ vote count should have been in the Election," McBurney wrote.
"This quixotic journey will not take place," he added.
Perdue harshly criticized the ruling saying it was "another example of how the establishment continues to cover up what happened in 2020, and we will vigorously appeal the decision."
The lawsuit "excoriates" county officials for "having ‘negligently, willfully, wantonly, outwardly, maliciously or corruptly and unapologetically acted with malfeasance’ thereby causing electors in Fulton County to experience ‘disenfranchisement, dilution, debasement, and corruption of their vote in the General Election,’" but it doesn’t seek a remedy for the alleged violations of the petitioners’ rights, McBurney wrote.
The lawsuit seeks a declaration that the court is unable to provide and without such a declaration, the petitioners’ requests "are left supported only by sour grapes which make a wine this Court will not serve," McBurney wrote.